Weblog

Sunday, 22 November 2009

Saturday, 21 November 2009

  • A movie for the times...a review

    Movie Title: Off the Map (2003)

    Main Actor(s) and Actresses(s): Joan Allen, Sam Elliot, JK Rollings, Jim True-Frost, Valentina de Angelis

    Abstract: A couple with one daughter lives entirely off the grid with their own set of problems, and on top of this an IRS agent comes out to audit their tax return.

    Actual Review: This is the movie I think of when I think of Joan Allen, not the Bourne series. She plays an earthy, sexy with a hint of purposeful seduction so well; that I still have a hard time seeing her all dolled up with make up. I enjoyed seeing her playing a game with this IRS agent that makes the movie a bit subtle and mischievous yet becoming grounded around her depressed husband. So good.

    I also really enjoyed Sam Elliot's character as well. I like how lethargic he is and how everyone knows it, it makes everyone feel tightly knit. Although at some points it feels like this movie is overselling this quality (of being tightly knit) to overstate the purpose of living off the grid with no money may just be paradise.

    I like how this movie has a tendency at the end for the viewer to possibly reconsider what they hold of value in their life, by taking away all the conveniences one has. This is communicated throughout the movie with a kind of swagger, as not to shock, but to impose it has always been.

    If you don't find living off the grid interesting or subtle performances from seasoned actors and actresses interesting then you probably won't like this movie. It is a slow burn and at times vague. I loved it. Now if I can only find it again.


    Video URL: http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi1704591641/

Thursday, 19 November 2009

  • Grammar: What is it good for, absolutely nothin', say it again (revised version)

    *The biggest part of grammar, is revision and cooperation, I thought I would post Roadkill_Spatula's suggested revisions to my original essay to prove some kind of point. The suggestions are in italics.

    Grammar is what I define as the rules of language. They have been around for hundreds of years. The purpose of this essay is not inform, however; it is here for a Socratic debate.

    So why rules for written language, anyway?

    Is it so a message can be understood more clearly? Clearly, misspelled and mistaken words as well as sentence structure can majorly [neologism; maybe use 'significantly'] affect or distract from the message a writer may be trying to send. What makes our language functional? If someone understands what a person is trying to say (or write) but feels it should be done more effectively, is there an efficiency factor involved?

    Functional hardly means efficient. Grammar holds the status quo of written language as an accepted way of communication. Dunno if tha is righ. Straying from the rules of language means one is inventing his or her own language or language that has become culturally accepted [ambiguous; do you mean 'straying from his or her own culturally accepted language'?].

    There are so many way to invent variations in language; it is such a fluid and fickle thing. That is why one can never say that something is well written. What is well written? Something that properly adheres to grammar while telling a story or essay [do we tell essays?] or one [one what? need to use a noun here or repeat 'something'] that strays into new territory while inventing new rules with the intention of being original? Original is a loose word, built on concepts of those before them [whom? No referent for 'them'], broken and discarded languages before them [whom? And I can’t tell if 'broken and discarded' are adjectives or verbs here].

    Ones [Languages? Rules? Books? Authors?] you would find in a bargain section at a book store

    Token Question: What is the purpose of grammar, in your own definition? What does it mean to you?

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

  • The Night my Computer Died

    Set the scene:
    Okay writing another painful 1000 words for NanuNanu, the kitchen light is on, so is my little IKEA lamp so my eyes don't hurt from staring at the screen all the time. I have just eaten, so the stomach is full with a glass of water to keep me company.

    What happened:
    My computer tells me that it cannot save my file at its current path, which is weird because it had saved it there 100 times before and nothing had changed. Finally it saves. Whew. Okay go back to talking about how this character is going through college...won't save again? Finally it saves. Okay. Where was I?

    The big window pops up, it says I have thirty seconds to save everything I've got before the computer shuts down, I run over to get my USB storage device. Serious, slow motion running. Copied the word file from the desktop to the port and wait. Try to restart computer, acts like it is going to boot and then never does. Pretty sure hard drive is fried.

    Have a hard time going to sleep, don't really want to go through writing one or two thousand words again. Wonder if that is it, maybe there is more? Maybe I didn't save it to the storage device as often as I thought.

    Conclusion:
    Tried restarting this morning, no good, same deal. Hard drive has to be fried, Operating System not Found...what do you mean Operating System not Found, where did it go?

    Get to work computer, there it is, every word I have written so far, in its ugly glory. Like a bomb technician, I extracted the file.

online now youandwhosearmy

  • Visit youandwhosearmy's Xanga Site
    • Name: Nelson
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 4/24/2003
    • True Premium

About Me

  • So as it should, writing (or other forms of love making) not as an act of restraint, but one of profanity, that is, until one takes a breath from on high to see what is good. To see what is left after the failure. NS 7/14/09

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

Recommended